Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SOWELL v. RAV INVESTIGATIVE & SECURITY SERVICES, LTD., 15-03657. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20160527d63 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 26, 2016
Latest Update: May 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW , this 26th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff Lamar Sowell's ("Sowell") unopposed Motion for Default Judgment Against RAV Investigative & Security Services, LTD ("RAV") (ECF No. 17), and his Memorandum of Law in Support of Request for Entry of Judgment Against RAV (ECF No. 18), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED . It is further ORDERED that: 1. Judgment is entered against RAV and in favor of Sowell for back pay i
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff Lamar Sowell's ("Sowell") unopposed Motion for Default Judgment Against RAV Investigative & Security Services, LTD ("RAV") (ECF No. 17), and his Memorandum of Law in Support of Request for Entry of Judgment Against RAV (ECF No. 18), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that:

1. Judgment is entered against RAV and in favor of Sowell for back pay in the amount of $21,614. 2. Judgment is entered against RAV and in favor of Sowell for compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500. 3. Judgment is entered against RAV and in favor of Sowell for punitive damages in the amount of $5,000. 4. Sowell may pursue a claim for prejudgment interest on back pay awarded within ten days of this Order. Such motion shall indicate the prejudgment interest rate to be applied, the reason therefor, the prejudgment interest dollar amount sought, and the method of calculation.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer