Eastern Approach Rehabilitation, LLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 16-cv-1374. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160602f77
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 3), Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 7), Plaintiffs' Reply in Further Support thereof (Doc. No. 8), and Defendants' Sur-reply is Further Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 9), and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. No. 4) and Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 6), it is hereby ORDERED t
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 3), Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 7), Plaintiffs' Reply in Further Support thereof (Doc. No. 8), and Defendants' Sur-reply is Further Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 9), and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. No. 4) and Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 6), it is hereby ORDERED th..
More
ORDER
J. CURTIS JOYNER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 3), Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 7), Plaintiffs' Reply in Further Support thereof (Doc. No. 8), and Defendants' Sur-reply is Further Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 9), and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. No. 4) and Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 6), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Remand is DENIED and the Motion to Dismiss Count II is GRANTED for the reasons discussed in the accompanying memorandum.
Source: Leagle
