ADAMS v. HARRY, 15-4186. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160629j09
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 28th day of June, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed by pro se Petitioner, Shaun D. Adams, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, dated February 24, 2016, and Petitioner's Objections to Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPRO
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 28th day of June, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed by pro se Petitioner, Shaun D. Adams, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, dated February 24, 2016, and Petitioner's Objections to Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROV..
More
ORDER
GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, District Judge.
This 28th day of June, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed by pro se Petitioner, Shaun D. Adams, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, dated February 24, 2016, and Petitioner's Objections to Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections is GRANTED;
3. Petitioner's Objections are OVERRULED for the reasons explained in the Report and Recommendation;
4. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY; and
5. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
