Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BOWDEN v. SCHENKER, 16-1272. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20160726b26 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 25 th day of July 2016, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 7), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 13), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 14), following extensive oral argument, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED as Plaintiff has not stated claims for misappropriation of ideas, unjust enrichment or quantum meruit
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of July 2016, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 7), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 13), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 14), following extensive oral argument, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED as Plaintiff has not stated claims for misappropriation of ideas, unjust enrichment or quantum meruit under Pennsylvania Law.

The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer