BOWDEN v. SCHENKER, 16-1272. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160726b26
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 25 th day of July 2016, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 7), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 13), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 14), following extensive oral argument, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED as Plaintiff has not stated claims for misappropriation of ideas, unjust enrichment or quantum meruit
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 25 th day of July 2016, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 7), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 13), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 14), following extensive oral argument, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED as Plaintiff has not stated claims for misappropriation of ideas, unjust enrichment or quantum meruit ..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 25th day of July 2016, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 7), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 13), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 14), following extensive oral argument, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED as Plaintiff has not stated claims for misappropriation of ideas, unjust enrichment or quantum meruit under Pennsylvania Law.
The Clerk of Court shall close this case.
Source: Leagle
