Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WHITE v. MEDTRONIC, INC., 16-2638. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20160901d23 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 31, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2016
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III , District Judge . AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2016, for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of defendants Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Meuromodulation, a division of Metronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations, Inc. and Medtronic Logistics, LLC to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim (Doc. # 6) is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's claims for failure to warn, negligence, negligence per s
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2016, for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) the motion of defendants Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Meuromodulation, a division of Metronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations, Inc. and Medtronic Logistics, LLC to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim (Doc. # 6) is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's claims for failure to warn, negligence, negligence per se, breach of implied warranty, negligent misrepresentation, and violation of Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law;

(2) the motion of defendants insofar as it seeks to dismiss plaintiff's claim for breach of express warranty with respect to the SynchroMed® II Device and the first catheter implanted on February 5, 2010 is GRANTED as the claim to this extent is untimely; and

(3) the motion of defendants to dismiss the complaint is otherwise DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer