Filed: Sep. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 20 th day of September 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Imerys Talc America, Inc. f/k/a Luzenac America, Inc.'s Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or for failure to state a claim as to Counts Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten (ECF Doc. No. 21), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 24) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant Imerys Talc America, Inc. f/k/a Luzenac America, Inc.'s Motion
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 20 th day of September 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Imerys Talc America, Inc. f/k/a Luzenac America, Inc.'s Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or for failure to state a claim as to Counts Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten (ECF Doc. No. 21), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 24) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant Imerys Talc America, Inc. f/k/a Luzenac America, Inc.'s Motion ..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 20th day of September 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Imerys Talc America, Inc. f/k/a Luzenac America, Inc.'s Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or for failure to state a claim as to Counts Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten (ECF Doc. No. 21), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 24) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant Imerys Talc America, Inc. f/k/a Luzenac America, Inc.'s Motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 21) is DENIED.
Defendant Imerys Talc America, Inc. f/k/a Luzenac America, Inc., shall answer the Amended Complaint on or before October 4, 2016.
