Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TAGGART v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 16-00063. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20161006877 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2016
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 30 th day of September, 2016, upon consideration of the Motions to Dismiss by Defendants Wells Fargo, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company ("the Mortgage Defendants") (Docket No. 6), Lisa Roach (Docket No. 16), and Eugene Jaskiewicz (Docket No. 21); Plaintiff Kenneth Taggart's ("Plaintiff")'s Responses in Opposition and Motion to Remand (Docket N
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2016, upon consideration of the Motions to Dismiss by Defendants Wells Fargo, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company ("the Mortgage Defendants") (Docket No. 6), Lisa Roach (Docket No. 16), and Eugene Jaskiewicz (Docket No. 21); Plaintiff Kenneth Taggart's ("Plaintiff")'s Responses in Opposition and Motion to Remand (Docket Nos. 11 and 22); the Mortgage Defendants' Reply (Docket No. 13); and Plaintiff's Sur Reply and Motion to Stay (Docket No. 14), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay is DENIED; 3. Counts One, Two, Three, and Six of Plaintiff's Complaint are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 4. Counts Four and Five of Plaintiff's Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 5. Plaintiff has twenty (20) days in which to file an Amended Complaint.

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer