NIMLEY v. ROBINSON, 15-4473. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20161114p83
Filed: Nov. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW , this 9 th day of November, 2016, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Carl Robinson and Bryan Boyer (Docket No. 38), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 40), and Defendants' Reply (Docket No. 44), and having heard the arguments of counsel at a hearing before me on October 20, 2016, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED . It is so ORDERED.
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2016, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Carl Robinson and Bryan Boyer (Docket No. 38), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 40), and Defendants' Reply (Docket No. 44), and having heard the arguments of counsel at a hearing before me on October 20, 2016, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
