Filed: Nov. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2016
Summary: ORDER EDUARDO C. ROBRENO , District Judge . AND NOW , this 10th day of November, 2016 , upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (ECF No. 95) and the Order dated January 5, 2000 enjoining Plaintiff from, among other things, filing any further papers in this case (ECF No. 91), 1 and following a show cause hearing held on the record on October 28, 2016, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The rule is DISSOLVED . 2. Plaintiff's Moti
Summary: ORDER EDUARDO C. ROBRENO , District Judge . AND NOW , this 10th day of November, 2016 , upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (ECF No. 95) and the Order dated January 5, 2000 enjoining Plaintiff from, among other things, filing any further papers in this case (ECF No. 91), 1 and following a show cause hearing held on the record on October 28, 2016, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The rule is DISSOLVED . 2. Plaintiff's Motio..
More
ORDER
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (ECF No. 95) and the Order dated January 5, 2000 enjoining Plaintiff from, among other things, filing any further papers in this case (ECF No. 91),1 and following a show cause hearing held on the record on October 28, 2016, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The rule is DISSOLVED.
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (ECF No. 95) is DENIED for failure to satisfy the conditions in the Order dated January 5, 2000 (ECF No. 91).
3. Plaintiff's Petition for a Writ of Mandamus is STRICKEN as contrary to the Order dated January 5, 2000 (ECF No. 91).
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
