Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ALSTON v. GILMORE, 14-6439. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20170103a43 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAN E. DuBOIS , District Judge . AND NOW , this 29th day of December, 2016, upon consideration of Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by pro se petitioner, Khalif Alston, the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated August 16, 2016, and pro se petitioner's Written Objections in Responce [sic] to Report and Recommendation Filed by Henry S. Perkin, M.J., IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. The
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2016, upon consideration of Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by pro se petitioner, Khalif Alston, the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated August 16, 2016, and pro se petitioner's Written Objections in Responce [sic] to Report and Recommendation Filed by Henry S. Perkin, M.J., IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated August 16, 2016, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Pro se petitioner's Written Objections in Responce [sic] to Report and Recommendation Filed by Henry S. Perkin, M.J., which repeats the arguments made in support of his Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus and fails to address errors in the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated August 16, 2016, are OVERRULED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation which this Court has approved and adopted;

3. The Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by pro se petitioner, Khalif Alston is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE;

4. Pro se petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED on the ground that all of the evidence relevant to a ruling on the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is a matter of record;

5. A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not debate (a) this Court's decision that the petition does not state a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right, and (b) the propriety of this Court's procedural ruling with respect to petitioner's claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall MARK the case CLOSED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer