Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NIEMOCZYNSKI v. UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP OF PENNSYLVANIA, 16-0212. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20170126e73 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW , this 23 rd day of January , 2017, upon consideration of the Motions to Dismiss by Defendants Upper Mount Bethel Township, Upper Mount Bethel Township Zoning Board, Robert Cartwright, Maureen Sterner, Robert Collura, Jeffrey Manzi, and Ronald Angle ("the Township Defendants") (Docket No. 19) and Robert and Fran Aponick (Docket Nos. 15, 16, and 17); the Responses in Opposition by Plaintiffs Leon and Nalina Niemoczynski (Docket Nos. 20
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2017, upon consideration of the Motions to Dismiss by Defendants Upper Mount Bethel Township, Upper Mount Bethel Township Zoning Board, Robert Cartwright, Maureen Sterner, Robert Collura, Jeffrey Manzi, and Ronald Angle ("the Township Defendants") (Docket No. 19) and Robert and Fran Aponick (Docket Nos. 15, 16, and 17); the Responses in Opposition by Plaintiffs Leon and Nalina Niemoczynski (Docket Nos. 20 and 21); the Township Defendants' Reply (Docket No. 24); and Plaintiffs' Sur Reply (Docket No. 27), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Township Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 2. The Aponicks' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with respect to all claims against the Township Defendants and Fran Aponick; and 4. All claims against Robert Aponick are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 5. Plaintiffs have twenty (20) days in which to file an Amended Complaint.

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer