LONG v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, 16-1991. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20170410g53
Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2017
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. 25), Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition thereto (Doc. 27), and Defendant's Reply in Further Support of its Motion (Doc. 34), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED. 1 FootNotes 1. This Order accompanies the
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. 25), Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition thereto (Doc. 27), and Defendant's Reply in Further Support of its Motion (Doc. 34), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED. 1 FootNotes 1. This Order accompanies the C..
More
ORDER
PETRESE B. TUCKER, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. 25), Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition thereto (Doc. 27), and Defendant's Reply in Further Support of its Motion (Doc. 34), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED.1
FootNotes
1. This Order accompanies the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated April 5, 2017.
Source: Leagle
