VANDERVEER v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., 16-1979. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20170523d99
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 19, 2017
Latest Update: May 19, 2017
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK , District Judge . AND NOW , this 19 th day of May , 2017, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 20), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part and denied in part as follows: 1. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Americans with Disabilities Act claim against Defendant FedEx Ground (Count IV). Count IV is DISM
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK , District Judge . AND NOW , this 19 th day of May , 2017, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 20), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part and denied in part as follows: 1. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Americans with Disabilities Act claim against Defendant FedEx Ground (Count IV). Count IV is DISMI..
More
ORDER
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 19th day of May, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 20), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part and denied in part as follows:
1. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Americans with Disabilities Act claim against Defendant FedEx Ground (Count IV). Count IV is DISMISSED.
2. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's Title VII claims of race and gender discrimination against Defendant FedEx Ground (Count I).
3. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's Title VII claim of hostile work environment against Defendant FedEx Ground (Count II).
4. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1981 claim of race discrimination against all Defendants (Count III).
5. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's Pennsylvania Human Relations Act claim against all Defendants (Count V).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
