Filed: Aug. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2017
Summary: ORDER NITZA I. QUI ONES ALEJANDRO , District Judge . AND NOW , this 16 th day of August 2017, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., and Amazon Web Services, Inc., ("Moving Defendants"), [ECF 38], the response in opposition filed by Plaintiff Gordon Roy Parker ("Plaintiff"), [ECF 42], Moving Defendants' reply, [ECF 65], and the allegations contained in Plaintiff's second amended complaint, [ECF 47], it is hereby ORDERED , for the reasons set fo
Summary: ORDER NITZA I. QUI ONES ALEJANDRO , District Judge . AND NOW , this 16 th day of August 2017, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., and Amazon Web Services, Inc., ("Moving Defendants"), [ECF 38], the response in opposition filed by Plaintiff Gordon Roy Parker ("Plaintiff"), [ECF 42], Moving Defendants' reply, [ECF 65], and the allegations contained in Plaintiff's second amended complaint, [ECF 47], it is hereby ORDERED , for the reasons set for..
More
ORDER
NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 16th day of August 2017, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., and Amazon Web Services, Inc., ("Moving Defendants"), [ECF 38], the response in opposition filed by Plaintiff Gordon Roy Parker ("Plaintiff"), [ECF 42], Moving Defendants' reply, [ECF 65], and the allegations contained in Plaintiff's second amended complaint, [ECF 47], it is hereby ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion filed on this day, that Moving Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Moving Defendants are DISMISSED, with prejudice, from this case.
