AUSTIN v. GRILL, 16-6509. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20170831f53
Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY R. RICE , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, on August 30, 2017, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and supporting filings (docs. 29, 33) and Plaintiff's Response (doc. 32), and in accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is ORDERED that the motion is: • GRANTED as to Plaintiff Mark Austin's sex discrimination claim (Count I); • GRANTED as to Austin's race discrimination claim (Count II); and • DENIED as to Austin's retaliation claim
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY R. RICE , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, on August 30, 2017, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and supporting filings (docs. 29, 33) and Plaintiff's Response (doc. 32), and in accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is ORDERED that the motion is: • GRANTED as to Plaintiff Mark Austin's sex discrimination claim (Count I); • GRANTED as to Austin's race discrimination claim (Count II); and • DENIED as to Austin's retaliation claim (..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY R. RICE, Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, on August 30, 2017, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and supporting filings (docs. 29, 33) and Plaintiff's Response (doc. 32), and in accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is ORDERED that the motion is:
• GRANTED as to Plaintiff Mark Austin's sex discrimination claim (Count I);
• GRANTED as to Austin's race discrimination claim (Count II); and
• DENIED as to Austin's retaliation claim (Count III).
Source: Leagle
