ROMERO v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 01-3894 (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20170906i07
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2017
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5th day of September 2017, upon considering Defendants' Motion for summary judgment on the Phase III Plaintiffs' ADEA disparate treatment claims (Count IV) (ECF Doc. No. 1174), Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No. 1184), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 1192) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 1174) is GRANTED as there are no genuine issues of material fact precluding judgme
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5th day of September 2017, upon considering Defendants' Motion for summary judgment on the Phase III Plaintiffs' ADEA disparate treatment claims (Count IV) (ECF Doc. No. 1174), Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No. 1184), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 1192) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 1174) is GRANTED as there are no genuine issues of material fact precluding judgmen..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of September 2017, upon considering Defendants' Motion for summary judgment on the Phase III Plaintiffs' ADEA disparate treatment claims (Count IV) (ECF Doc. No. 1174), Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No. 1184), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 1192) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 1174) is GRANTED as there are no genuine issues of material fact precluding judgment as a matter of law barring these disparate treatment claims as untimely and requiring we DISMISS Plaintiffs Joseph Eckert's, Steven Evans', Philip Metcalfe's, Craig Millison's, Paula Schott's and Stanley Suwala's claims in Count IV.
Source: Leagle
