Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ELLISON v. GARMAN, 16-0775. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20171103d81 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2017
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2017, upon consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and accompanying Memorandum of Law, (ECF Nos. 1 & 7), Respondents' Response in Opposition, (ECF No. 18), the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley, (ECF No. 19), and Ellison's Objections, (ECF No. 28), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Ellison's objections are OVERRULED and Magistrate Judge Heffley's Report and R
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2017, upon consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and accompanying Memorandum of Law, (ECF Nos. 1 & 7), Respondents' Response in Opposition, (ECF No. 18), the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley, (ECF No. 19), and Ellison's Objections, (ECF No. 28), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Ellison's objections are OVERRULED and Magistrate Judge Heffley's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Ellison's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice; 3. No certificate of appealability shall issue;1 4. This case shall be CLOSED for statistical purposes.

FootNotes


1. Reasonable jurists would not debate the Court's disposition of petitioner's claims. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer