USA v. FIELDS, 15-129. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20171129e74
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2017
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28th day of November 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Lamar Fields' Motion to Dismiss for Multiplicity (Doc. No. 219) and the Government's Response to Defendant's Motion for Multiplicity in which it represents that it is withdrawing Counts 2 to 7 of the Superseding Indictment (Doc. No. 231), it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Multiplicity (Doc. No. 219) is GRANTED and that Counts 2 to 7 of the Superseding In
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28th day of November 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Lamar Fields' Motion to Dismiss for Multiplicity (Doc. No. 219) and the Government's Response to Defendant's Motion for Multiplicity in which it represents that it is withdrawing Counts 2 to 7 of the Superseding Indictment (Doc. No. 231), it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Multiplicity (Doc. No. 219) is GRANTED and that Counts 2 to 7 of the Superseding Ind..
More
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 28th day of November 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Lamar Fields' Motion to Dismiss for Multiplicity (Doc. No. 219) and the Government's Response to Defendant's Motion for Multiplicity in which it represents that it is withdrawing Counts 2 to 7 of the Superseding Indictment (Doc. No. 231), it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Multiplicity (Doc. No. 219) is GRANTED and that Counts 2 to 7 of the Superseding Indictment are DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
