NINEVEH INVESTMENTS LIMITED v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16-1068. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20171206e08
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2017
Summary: ORDER JAN E. DuBOIS , District Judge . AND NOW , this 4th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiff's Motion for Application of Foreign Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 (Doc. No. 37), the United States' Opposition to Nineveh's Motion for Application of Foreign Law (Doc. No. 38), plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion for Application of Foreign Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 (Doc. No. 40), and the United States' Sur-Reply in Opposition
Summary: ORDER JAN E. DuBOIS , District Judge . AND NOW , this 4th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiff's Motion for Application of Foreign Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 (Doc. No. 37), the United States' Opposition to Nineveh's Motion for Application of Foreign Law (Doc. No. 38), plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion for Application of Foreign Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 (Doc. No. 40), and the United States' Sur-Reply in Opposition t..
More
ORDER
JAN E. DuBOIS, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 4th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiff's Motion for Application of Foreign Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 (Doc. No. 37), the United States' Opposition to Nineveh's Motion for Application of Foreign Law (Doc. No. 38), plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion for Application of Foreign Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 (Doc. No. 40), and the United States' Sur-Reply in Opposition to Nineveh's Motion for Application of Foreign Law (Doc. No. 43), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated December 4, 2017, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Application of Foreign Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Pennsylvania law will be applied in this case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case shall proceed in accordance with the Scheduling Order dated June 14, 2017, with one correction—Paragraph 4 of that Order is corrected to state that plaintiff shall file and serve a motion for summary judgment and both parties shall file and serve Daubert motions on or before July 20, 2018, not July 20, 2017.
Source: Leagle
