EL v. ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, 17-2345. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20171228d73
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 27 th day of December 2017, upon considering Defendant's Motion for summary judgment (ECF Doc. No. 19), Plaintiff's Response (ECF Doc. No. 28) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part : 1. We GRANT summary judgment on Ms. El's ADA discrimination claim as lacking genuine issues of material fact; and, 2. We DENY Defendant's Motion
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 27 th day of December 2017, upon considering Defendant's Motion for summary judgment (ECF Doc. No. 19), Plaintiff's Response (ECF Doc. No. 28) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part : 1. We GRANT summary judgment on Ms. El's ADA discrimination claim as lacking genuine issues of material fact; and, 2. We DENY Defendant's Motion ..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 27th day of December 2017, upon considering Defendant's Motion for summary judgment (ECF Doc. No. 19), Plaintiff's Response (ECF Doc. No. 28) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:
1. We GRANT summary judgment on Ms. El's ADA discrimination claim as lacking genuine issues of material fact; and,
2. We DENY Defendant's Motion for summary judgment on Ms. El's gender and race discrimination, hostile work environment based on race and gender and Title VII retaliation claims which shall proceed to trial.
Source: Leagle
