BENNETT v. CLARK, 16-3687. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180102a07
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2017
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW , this 29th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Rice, (ECF No. 13), and Carlton Bennett's objections thereto, (ECF No. 19), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Bennett's objections are OVERRULED and Magistrate Judge Rice's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED ; 2. Bennett's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSE
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW , this 29th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Rice, (ECF No. 13), and Carlton Bennett's objections thereto, (ECF No. 19), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Bennett's objections are OVERRULED and Magistrate Judge Rice's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED ; 2. Bennett's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED..
More
ORDER
GERALD J. PAPPERT, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Rice, (ECF No. 13), and Carlton Bennett's objections thereto, (ECF No. 19), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Bennett's objections are OVERRULED and Magistrate Judge Rice's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. Bennett's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED;
3. No certificate of appealability shall issue;3
4. This case shall be CLOSED for statistical purposes.
FootNotes
3. No reasonable jurist would disagree with the Court's disposition of petitioner's claims. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
Source: Leagle
