Filed: Jan. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER PAUL S. DIAMOND , District Judge . AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of Petitioner David Jackson's pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. No. 1), Jackson's pro se Amended Petition (Doc. No. 6), the Commonwealth's Response (Doc. No. 11), Judge Perkin's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12), Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 15), and all other related submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's Objections
Summary: ORDER PAUL S. DIAMOND , District Judge . AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of Petitioner David Jackson's pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. No. 1), Jackson's pro se Amended Petition (Doc. No. 6), the Commonwealth's Response (Doc. No. 11), Judge Perkin's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12), Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 15), and all other related submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's Objections ..
More
ORDER
PAUL S. DIAMOND, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of Petitioner David Jackson's pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1), Jackson's pro se Amended Petition (Doc. No. 6), the Commonwealth's Response (Doc. No. 11), Judge Perkin's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12), Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 15), and all other related submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 15) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED with prejudice;
4. A Certificate of Appealability shall NOT ISSUE under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) because Petitioner has not demonstrated that "reasonable jurists" would find it debatable whether the Petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that my procedural ruling was correct. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and
5. The CLERK OF COURT shall CLOSE this action.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
