Filed: Jan. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE , District Judge . NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of defendants Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Document No. 46), the plaintiff's response, and the defendants' reply, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: 1. To the extent the motion seeks to dismiss Count IX (Conversion) and Count XI (Permanent Injunction), it is GRANTED;
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE , District Judge . NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of defendants Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Document No. 46), the plaintiff's response, and the defendants' reply, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: 1. To the extent the motion seeks to dismiss Count IX (Conversion) and Count XI (Permanent Injunction), it is GRANTED; ..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, District Judge.
NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of defendants Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Document No. 46), the plaintiff's response, and the defendants' reply, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:
1. To the extent the motion seeks to dismiss Count IX (Conversion) and Count XI (Permanent Injunction), it is GRANTED;
2. To the extent the motion seeks to dismiss Counts I, II, IV, VI, VII, VIII, and X, it is DENIED; and
3. Counts IX and XI as to defendants Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corporation are DISMISSED.
