LEIKHEIM v. BERRYHILL, 17-1011. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180206e98
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 1 st day of February, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa, the plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 12), and the defendant's response (Doc. No. 14), and upon careful review of the entire record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The plaintiff's Objections are SUSTAINED ; 2. The plaintiff's request for judicial review is GRANTED ; 3
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 1 st day of February, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa, the plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 12), and the defendant's response (Doc. No. 14), and upon careful review of the entire record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The plaintiff's Objections are SUSTAINED ; 2. The plaintiff's request for judicial review is GRANTED ; 3...
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa, the plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 12), and the defendant's response (Doc. No. 14), and upon careful review of the entire record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The plaintiff's Objections are SUSTAINED;
2. The plaintiff's request for judicial review is GRANTED;
3. The final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the accompanying memorandum.
Source: Leagle
