TIBURON LOCKERS, INC. v. NORTHGATE DIGITAL CORPORATION, 15-5050. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180207d21
Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5th day of February 2018, upon consideration of the cross-motions for summary judgment and the responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 39] is GRANTED as to the claims asserted by Plaintiff and DENIED to the extent it belatedly sought summary judgment on the counterclaim. 2. Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Sum
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5th day of February 2018, upon consideration of the cross-motions for summary judgment and the responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 39] is GRANTED as to the claims asserted by Plaintiff and DENIED to the extent it belatedly sought summary judgment on the counterclaim. 2. Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summ..
More
ORDER
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of February 2018, upon consideration of the cross-motions for summary judgment and the responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 39] is GRANTED as to the claims asserted by Plaintiff and DENIED to the extent it belatedly sought summary judgment on the counterclaim.
2. Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 45] is DENIED.
3. The parties shall confer and file within 14 days a joint proposal with regard to resolution of the counterclaim.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
