Phillips v. SEPTA, 16-0986. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180213a74
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER EDUARDO C. ROBRENO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18), Plaintiff's Response thereto (ECF No. 21), and Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply (ECF No. 22), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply (ECF No
Summary: ORDER EDUARDO C. ROBRENO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18), Plaintiff's Response thereto (ECF No. 21), and Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply (ECF No. 22), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply (ECF No...
More
ORDER
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18), Plaintiff's Response thereto (ECF No. 21), and Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply (ECF No. 22), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED.
2. Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply (ECF No. 22) is DENIED.
3. The Clerk shall mark this case as closed.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
