Malone v. Weiss, 17-1694. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180213a76
Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2018 upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (ECF No. 31), and Defendants' Reply thereto (ECF No. 32), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: (a) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts Three and Four (breach of contract and piercing the corporate veil) is GRANTED. Counts Three and Four are
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2018 upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (ECF No. 31), and Defendants' Reply thereto (ECF No. 32), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: (a) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts Three and Four (breach of contract and piercing the corporate veil) is GRANTED. Counts Three and Four are D..
More
ORDER
WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2018 upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (ECF No. 31), and Defendants' Reply thereto (ECF No. 32), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
(a) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts Three and Four (breach of contract and piercing the corporate veil) is GRANTED. Counts Three and Four are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs shall have 7 days from the date of this Order to file a Second Amended Complaint, consistent with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion.
(b) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count Five (fraudulent inducement) is GRANTED. Count Five is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
(c) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count Six (conversion) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
