Elawyers Elawyers

Spachman v. Social Security Administration, 16-4735. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20180320e45 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , District Judge . AND NOW, this __ 19th __ day of March, 2018, upon careful consideration of Brief of Appellant Angelina Spachman (Doc. 13), Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Doc. 14), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (Doc. 16), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED ; 2. Plaintiff's Request for Review is DENIED ; and
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this __ 19th __ day of March, 2018, upon careful consideration of Brief of Appellant Angelina Spachman (Doc. 13), Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Doc. 14), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (Doc. 16), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's Request for Review is DENIED; and 3. Judgment is entered affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark the above-captioned matter as CLOSED for statistical purposes.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer