Morlok v. City of Philadelphia, 17-4213. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180504b87
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS MICHAEL M. BAYLSON , District Judge . AND NOW, this 27 th day of April, 2018 having considered the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF 9) of Defendant the City of Philadelphia, and the response and reply thereto, and for the reasons explained in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Count I of the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, with leave to amend; 2. Count II of the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, with leave to amend;
Summary: ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS MICHAEL M. BAYLSON , District Judge . AND NOW, this 27 th day of April, 2018 having considered the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF 9) of Defendant the City of Philadelphia, and the response and reply thereto, and for the reasons explained in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Count I of the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, with leave to amend; 2. Count II of the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, with leave to amend; ..
More
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2018 having considered the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF 9) of Defendant the City of Philadelphia, and the response and reply thereto, and for the reasons explained in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Count I of the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, with leave to amend;
2. Count II of the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, with leave to amend;
3. Count III of the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, with leave to amend;
4. Any amendments must be made within fourteen (14) days.
Source: Leagle
