Kunsman v. Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 17-4619. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180625a78
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 21 st day of June, 2018, upon reviewing Defendant Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company's ("MetLife") Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10), all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant MetLife's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. 2. Plaintiff Kunsman's Bad Faith
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 21 st day of June, 2018, upon reviewing Defendant Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company's ("MetLife") Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10), all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant MetLife's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. 2. Plaintiff Kunsman's Bad Faith c..
More
ORDER
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2018, upon reviewing Defendant Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company's ("MetLife") Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10), all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant MetLife's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.
2. Plaintiff Kunsman's Bad Faith claim (Count II) will remain.
3. Paragraphs 31, 33, and 34 shall be stricken from Plaintiff Kunsman's Amended Complaint.
Source: Leagle
