Robinson v. Mooney, 16-4224. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180718d23
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 16 th day of July, 2018, upon independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the response and supplemental response to the petition (Documents #12 and 16), and after careful review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, there being no objections thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPT
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 16 th day of July, 2018, upon independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the response and supplemental response to the petition (Documents #12 and 16), and after careful review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, there being no objections thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTE..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 2018, upon independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the response and supplemental response to the petition (Documents #12 and 16), and after careful review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, there being no objections thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
