Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Mauthe, M.D., P.C. v. Optum, Inc., 17-1643. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20180730e64 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER EDWARD G. SMITH , District Judge . AND NOW , this 27th day of July, 2018, after considering the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants (Doc. No. 40), the response in opposition to the motion filed by the plaintiff (Doc. No. 47), the defendants' reply to the response in opposition (Doc. No. 50), the record presented to the court by the parties, the arguments presented to the court during oral argument; and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opini
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2018, after considering the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants (Doc. No. 40), the response in opposition to the motion filed by the plaintiff (Doc. No. 47), the defendants' reply to the response in opposition (Doc. No. 50), the record presented to the court by the parties, the arguments presented to the court during oral argument; and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion; accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 40) is GRANTED IN PART. Summary judgment is entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff on Count I of the amended complaint (Doc. No. 25);

2. Count II of the amended complaint (Doc. No. 25) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3); and

3. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to mark this case as CLOSED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer