Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Britax Child Safety, Inc. v. Nuna International B.V., 5:17-cv-02724. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20180730e66 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. , District Judge . AND NOW , this 26th day of July, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 26, and for the reasons expressed in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED THAT : 1. Defendants' Motion is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to dismiss Plaintiff's claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). 2. Defendants' Motion under Rule 12(b)(2) is DENIED without prejudice in all other respects, subject to Defendants' right to renew the Rule 1
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 26, and for the reasons expressed in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' Motion is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to dismiss Plaintiff's claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). 2. Defendants' Motion under Rule 12(b)(2) is DENIED without prejudice in all other respects, subject to Defendants' right to renew the Rule 12(b)(2) motion at the close of jurisdictional discovery. 3. The parties shall complete any discovery relevant to this Court's jurisdiction by September 8, 2018. 4. Defendants shall file an answer to the Amended Complaint or any renewed 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on or before September 8, 2018.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer