Losota v. Child Guidance Resource Centers, Inc., 18-696. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180731c48
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. KELLY , Senior District Judge . AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant Child Guidance Resource Centers, Inc.'s ("CGRC") "Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV of First Amended Complaint and Motion to Strike Punitive Damages Claim in Count II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint" (Doc. No. 7), Plaintiff Monica Losota's Brief in Support of her Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and CGRC's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismis
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. KELLY , Senior District Judge . AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant Child Guidance Resource Centers, Inc.'s ("CGRC") "Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV of First Amended Complaint and Motion to Strike Punitive Damages Claim in Count II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint" (Doc. No. 7), Plaintiff Monica Losota's Brief in Support of her Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and CGRC's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss..
More
ORDER
ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge.
AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant Child Guidance Resource Centers, Inc.'s ("CGRC") "Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV of First Amended Complaint and Motion to Strike Punitive Damages Claim in Count II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint" (Doc. No. 7), Plaintiff Monica Losota's Brief in Support of her Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and CGRC's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss, it is hereby ORDERED that CGRC's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is FURTHER ORDERED that:
1. CGRC's Motion is GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of Count III of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and to strike the punitive damages claim in Count II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Count III of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the punitive damages claim in Count II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is STRICKEN; and
2. CGRC's Motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks dismissal of Count IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint.
Source: Leagle
