Filed: Aug. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER NITZA I. QUI ONES ALEJANDRO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 1 st day of August 2018, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Jeffrey Hopkins ("Defendant Hopkins") and North Star Exteriors, LLC ("Defendant North Star") (collectively, "Moving Defendants"), [ECF 27], Plaintiff's opposition thereto, [ECF 28], Moving Defendants' reply, [ECF 31], and the allegations contained in the complaint, [ECF 1], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in th
Summary: ORDER NITZA I. QUI ONES ALEJANDRO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 1 st day of August 2018, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Jeffrey Hopkins ("Defendant Hopkins") and North Star Exteriors, LLC ("Defendant North Star") (collectively, "Moving Defendants"), [ECF 27], Plaintiff's opposition thereto, [ECF 28], Moving Defendants' reply, [ECF 31], and the allegations contained in the complaint, [ECF 1], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the..
More
ORDER
NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 1st day of August 2018, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Jeffrey Hopkins ("Defendant Hopkins") and North Star Exteriors, LLC ("Defendant North Star") (collectively, "Moving Defendants"), [ECF 27], Plaintiff's opposition thereto, [ECF 28], Moving Defendants' reply, [ECF 31], and the allegations contained in the complaint, [ECF 1], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Moving Defendants' motion is GRANTED, in part, as follows:
(1) the motion to dismiss is GRANTED with respect to all claims asserted against Defendant Hopkins only;
(2) the motion to dismiss is DENIED in all other respects.
