Filed: Sep. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAN E. DUBOIS , District Judge . AND NOW , this 7th day of September, 2018, upon consideration of Motion under 28 U.S.C. 60(b)(6 [sic] for Relief of, a [sic] Application Claim of Actual Innocence (Document No. 36, filed November 29, 2017), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated September 7, 2018, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Motion under 28 U.S.C. 60(b)(6 [sic] for Relief of, a [sic] Application Claim of Actual Innocence filed by pro se petitioner (Document No. 36
Summary: ORDER JAN E. DUBOIS , District Judge . AND NOW , this 7th day of September, 2018, upon consideration of Motion under 28 U.S.C. 60(b)(6 [sic] for Relief of, a [sic] Application Claim of Actual Innocence (Document No. 36, filed November 29, 2017), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated September 7, 2018, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Motion under 28 U.S.C. 60(b)(6 [sic] for Relief of, a [sic] Application Claim of Actual Innocence filed by pro se petitioner (Document No. 36,..
More
ORDER
JAN E. DUBOIS, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 2018, upon consideration of Motion under 28 U.S.C. 60(b)(6 [sic] for Relief of, a [sic] Application Claim of Actual Innocence (Document No. 36, filed November 29, 2017), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated September 7, 2018, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Motion under 28 U.S.C. 60(b)(6 [sic] for Relief of, a [sic] Application Claim of Actual Innocence filed by pro se petitioner (Document No. 36, filed November 29, 2017) is DENIED; and,
2. The Clerk of Court shall mark this matter CLOSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not debate (a) this Court's decision that the petition does not state a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right, or (b) the propriety of this Court's procedural ruling(s) with respect to petitioner's claim(s). See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
