Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gurina v. Berryhill, 16-3879. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20181009d34 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 4th day of October 2018, upon consideration of the administrative record, Plaintiff's request for review, Defendant's response, Plaintiff's reply, The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, the objections to the Report and Recommendation and the response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk is directed to REMOVE the case from Civil Suspense; 2. The Objections to the Report and R
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of October 2018, upon consideration of the administrative record, Plaintiff's request for review, Defendant's response, Plaintiff's reply, The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, the objections to the Report and Recommendation and the response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk is directed to REMOVE the case from Civil Suspense;

2. The Objections to the Report and Recommendation are SUSTAINED in part;

3. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED IN PART and REJECTED IN PART as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion;

4. The Plaintiff's request for reversal is GRANTED; and

5. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further review consistent with the Report and Recommendation and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

It is so ORDERED.

FootNotes


* Substituted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer