Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Moats v. Berryhill, 18-1233. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20181015b75 Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 10 th , day of October, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration, the record reveals that the Commissioner did not apply correct legal standards and that the record does not contain substantial evidence to support the ALJ's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 2. The Commissioner's unopposed motion for remand is GRANTED; 3. P
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th, day of October, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration, the record reveals that the Commissioner did not apply correct legal standards and that the record does not contain substantial evidence to support the ALJ's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 2. The Commissioner's unopposed motion for remand is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff's request for review is DENIED AS MOOT; 4. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, reversing the decision of the Commissioner for purposes of remand; and 5. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with this adjudication.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer