Willoughby v. Smith, 17-5754. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20181129e90
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28 day of Nov , 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley, and objections there to, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. 3. There is no basis for
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28 day of Nov , 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley, and objections there to, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. 3. There is no basis for t..
More
ORDER
BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 28 day of Nov, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley, and objections there to, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
