Van De Kamp v. Transdermal Specialties, Inc., 16-cv-02768. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20181218e22
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LLORET , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons explained in my Memorandum Opinion filed with this Order, it is on this 17th day of December, 2018, ORDERED That Plaintiffs' motion to exclude lay opinion testimony by Bruce Redding is GRANTED, as to lost future profits. Any exhibits introduced to support Mr. Redding's lay opinion testimony also are excluded. To the extent Plaintiffs' motion seeks exclusion of other types of lay opinion evidence, it is DENIED, with leave to
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LLORET , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons explained in my Memorandum Opinion filed with this Order, it is on this 17th day of December, 2018, ORDERED That Plaintiffs' motion to exclude lay opinion testimony by Bruce Redding is GRANTED, as to lost future profits. Any exhibits introduced to support Mr. Redding's lay opinion testimony also are excluded. To the extent Plaintiffs' motion seeks exclusion of other types of lay opinion evidence, it is DENIED, with leave to r..
More
ORDER
RICHARD A. LLORET, Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons explained in my Memorandum Opinion filed with this Order, it is on this 17th day of December, 2018,
ORDERED
That Plaintiffs' motion to exclude lay opinion testimony by Bruce Redding is GRANTED, as to lost future profits. Any exhibits introduced to support Mr. Redding's lay opinion testimony also are excluded. To the extent Plaintiffs' motion seeks exclusion of other types of lay opinion evidence, it is DENIED, with leave to renew before trial by motion in limine.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that on or before December 28, 2018 Mr. Redding will supply an affidavit detailing the evidence, reasoning and conclusion for any lay opinions he intends to proffer at trial in support of his damage theories.
The Clerk will ensure this Order is mailed and emailed to Mr. Redding.
Source: Leagle
