Russell v. Kauffman, 17-0565. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190123e52
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES, II , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18 th day of January, 2019, upon independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1), the Response to the Petition (Docket No. 16), and after review of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated May 2, 2019, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. the R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED without prejudice
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES, II , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18 th day of January, 2019, upon independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1), the Response to the Petition (Docket No. 16), and after review of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated May 2, 2019, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. the R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED without prejudice ..
More
ORDER
C. DARNELL JONES, II, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 18th day of January, 2019, upon independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1), the Response to the Petition (Docket No. 16), and after review of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated May 2, 2019, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. the R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED without prejudice and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. there is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
