Filed: Feb. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK , District Judge . AND NOW, this 7 th day of February , 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motions in Limine and For Discovery (ECF No. 97), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The Motion in Limine is DENIED as to Exhibits P-89 and P-310, which will not be admitted absent further offer of proof by Plaintiff at trial to establ
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK , District Judge . AND NOW, this 7 th day of February , 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motions in Limine and For Discovery (ECF No. 97), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The Motion in Limine is DENIED as to Exhibits P-89 and P-310, which will not be admitted absent further offer of proof by Plaintiff at trial to establi..
More
ORDER
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motions in Limine and For Discovery (ECF No. 97), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. The Motion in Limine is DENIED as to Exhibits P-89 and P-310, which will not be admitted absent further offer of proof by Plaintiff at trial to establish their relevance and admissibility.
2. The Motion in Limine is GRANTED IN PART as to evidence of Plaintiff's disability benefits, which will not be admitted for the purpose of offset or deduction from any award for emotional distress damages found to have resulted from Defendants' alleged tortious conduct. If Defendants seek to use such evidence for another purpose at trial, they must make an offer of proof as to the propriety of such purpose under applicable authority.
3. The Motion in Limine is GRANTED IN PART as to the documents attached as Exhibits C, D, and E to Plaintiff's Motion, which will not be admitted for the purpose prohibited by Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)(1). If Defendants seek to use those documents for another purpose at trial, they must make an offer of proof as to their admissibility under applicable authority.
4. Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery of Defendants' financial information is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
