Reid v. Temple University Hospital, Inc., 17-2197. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190215c79
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III , District Judge . AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2019, after a telephone conference with counsel and for the reasons set forth in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that: (1) the motion of defendants for a protective order is GRANTED; (2) plaintiffs' counsel is precluded from taking depositions in this case in his home; and (3) all future depositions shall be taken at a suitable
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III , District Judge . AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2019, after a telephone conference with counsel and for the reasons set forth in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that: (1) the motion of defendants for a protective order is GRANTED; (2) plaintiffs' counsel is precluded from taking depositions in this case in his home; and (3) all future depositions shall be taken at a suitable p..
More
ORDER
HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2019, after a telephone conference with counsel and for the reasons set forth in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that:
(1) the motion of defendants for a protective order is GRANTED;
(2) plaintiffs' counsel is precluded from taking depositions in this case in his home; and
(3) all future depositions shall be taken at a suitable professional location.
Source: Leagle
