Filed: Feb. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER NITZA I. QUI ONES ALEJANDRO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 22 nd day of February 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment on pre-issuance damages and absolute intervening rights, [ECF 70], Plaintiffs opposition thereto, [ECF 79], Defendants' reply, [ECF 80], and Plaintiffs sur-reply, [ECF 84], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTE
Summary: ORDER NITZA I. QUI ONES ALEJANDRO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 22 nd day of February 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment on pre-issuance damages and absolute intervening rights, [ECF 70], Plaintiffs opposition thereto, [ECF 79], Defendants' reply, [ECF 80], and Plaintiffs sur-reply, [ECF 84], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED..
More
ORDER
NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of February 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment on pre-issuance damages and absolute intervening rights, [ECF 70], Plaintiffs opposition thereto, [ECF 79], Defendants' reply, [ECF 80], and Plaintiffs sur-reply, [ECF 84], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED. Accordingly, the damages Plaintiff may obtain in this matter are subject to the pre-issuance damages and absolute intervening rights protections provided by 35 U.S.C. §252.
