Lewis v. Overmyer, 18-3098. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190307e24
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , District Judge . AND NOW , this ________ 5th ____ day of March, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus , and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter (Doc. 15), and Petitioner's Objections thereto (Doc. 18), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED ; 2. The petition for Writ of Habeas Corp
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , District Judge . AND NOW , this ________ 5th ____ day of March, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus , and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter (Doc. 15), and Petitioner's Objections thereto (Doc. 18), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED ; 2. The petition for Writ of Habeas Corpu..
More
ORDER
PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this ________ 5th ____ day of March, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter (Doc. 15), and Petitioner's Objections thereto (Doc. 18), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust state court remedies; and
3. A certificate of appealability is not granted.
Source: Leagle
