Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Moyer v. Aramark, 18-cv-02267. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190311c33 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. , District Judge . AND NOW , this 7 th day of March, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, ECF No. 12; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 13; Plaintiffs' Response, ECF No. 14; and Defendants' Reply, ECF No. 15, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS ORDERED THAT : 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 13, is GRANTED in part ; 2. The claims in Counts I-IV are DISMISSED without prejudice ; 3. Plaintiff
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, ECF No. 12; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 13; Plaintiffs' Response, ECF No. 14; and Defendants' Reply, ECF No. 15, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 13, is GRANTED in part;

2. The claims in Counts I-IV are DISMISSED without prejudice;

3. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second Amended Complaint for Counts I-IV consistent with the accompanying Opinion on or before March 28, 2019; and

4. The Court will hold in abeyance its decision on the remaining state law claims in Counts V and VI pending the filing of a second Amended Complaint, if any.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer