Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, 18-5223. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190401g48
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III , District Judge . AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) The motion of defendant for reconsideration or, in the alternative, a protective order (Doc. # 8) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant will remain identified as "John Doe" throughout this litigation absent further order of this court. The motion is otherwise DENIED. (2) The motion of defendant for a more sp
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III , District Judge . AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) The motion of defendant for reconsideration or, in the alternative, a protective order (Doc. # 8) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant will remain identified as "John Doe" throughout this litigation absent further order of this court. The motion is otherwise DENIED. (2) The motion of defendant for a more spe..
More
ORDER
HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1) The motion of defendant for reconsideration or, in the alternative, a protective order (Doc. # 8) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant will remain identified as "John Doe" throughout this litigation absent further order of this court. The motion is otherwise DENIED.
(2) The motion of defendant for a more specific pleading (Doc. # 9) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
