King v. City of Philadelphia, 18-486. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190410g17
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19), the Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 31), and the oral argument thereon, it is ORDERED that: 1. the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as outlined in the Court's April 3, 2019 memorandum; and 2. Plaintiff Kimyetta King's claim against the City of Philadelp
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19), the Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 31), and the oral argument thereon, it is ORDERED that: 1. the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as outlined in the Court's April 3, 2019 memorandum; and 2. Plaintiff Kimyetta King's claim against the City of Philadelph..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19), the Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 31), and the oral argument thereon, it is ORDERED that:
1. the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as outlined in the Court's April 3, 2019 memorandum; and
2. Plaintiff Kimyetta King's claim against the City of Philadelphia only is DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
