McCracken v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, 17-4495. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190415a00
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 20 th day of March 2019, upon considering Plaintiffs' Motion for reargument (ECF Doc. 190), Defendants' Response (ECF Doc. No. 195), and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 190) is GRANTED on two arguments to clarify our findings in our February 14, 2019 Memorandum (ECF Doc. No. 184) but these clarified findings do not affect our February 14, 2019 Order (ECF Doc. No. 185) gra
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 20 th day of March 2019, upon considering Plaintiffs' Motion for reargument (ECF Doc. 190), Defendants' Response (ECF Doc. No. 195), and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 190) is GRANTED on two arguments to clarify our findings in our February 14, 2019 Memorandum (ECF Doc. No. 184) but these clarified findings do not affect our February 14, 2019 Order (ECF Doc. No. 185) gran..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 20th day of March 2019, upon considering Plaintiffs' Motion for reargument (ECF Doc. 190), Defendants' Response (ECF Doc. No. 195), and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 190) is GRANTED on two arguments to clarify our findings in our February 14, 2019 Memorandum (ECF Doc. No. 184) but these clarified findings do not affect our February 14, 2019 Order (ECF Doc. No. 185) granting summary judgment to the Defendants.
Source: Leagle