Caramagno v. Berryhill, 17-5014. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190418e88
Filed: Apr. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 15 th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of His Request for Review ("Request for Review") (Doc. 10), Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Doc. 12), Plaintiffs Reply Brief (Doc. 14), and the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa ("Report and Recommendation") (Doc. 17), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED as
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 15 th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of His Request for Review ("Request for Review") (Doc. 10), Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Doc. 12), Plaintiffs Reply Brief (Doc. 14), and the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa ("Report and Recommendation") (Doc. 17), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED as f..
More
ORDER
PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of His Request for Review ("Request for Review") (Doc. 10), Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Doc. 12), Plaintiffs Reply Brief (Doc. 14), and the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa ("Report and Recommendation") (Doc. 17), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; and
2. Plaintiffs Request for Review (Doc. 10) is DENIED consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark the above-captioned matter as CLOSED for statistical purposes.
Source: Leagle
